5 ms·
Depending how long ago you used it, you might give it another go. I spent a while trying and failing to use DDG reliably. Then I took a second pass a bit later
by peatmoss 9y ago
Depending how long ago you used it, you might give it another go.
I spent a while trying and failing to use DDG reliably. Then I took a second pass a bit later, the results were only a little worse than Google.
Then over time, I found myself using the !g command to double check DDG less and less.
I did a !g search for the first time in several months yesterday, and laughed when I saw how much worse Google’s results were.
Try it for a month. You may find out that you’re just used to a particular way of searching Google. Maybe DDG will offer you something better once you get a little familiarity.
In particular, I find technical topic searches to be head-and-shoulders better with DDG than Google.
- gtsteve 9y agoOK you've convinced me. I'll give it another shot. Edit: I just actually forgot how to list a directory in C# so I ran my first query: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=c%23+list+directory&atb=v112-5_y&ia=qa https://duckduckgo.com/?q=c%23+list+directory&atb=v112-5_y&i... It has a code sample right at the top. That's one better than Google right there!