4 ms·
Somewhat related is Thomas Metzinger’s The ego tunnel. Metzinger is an applied philosopher, directly examining what is consciousness as can be determined and ba
by SteveJS 8y ago
Somewhat related is Thomas Metzinger’s The ego tunnel.
Metzinger is an applied philosopher, directly examining what is consciousness as can be determined and backed up with neuroscience.
I loved Antonio Damasio’s the feeling of what happens, and the ego tunnel is like that on steroids, with years extra work from scientists making progress on teasing out distinctions you didn’t realize were there.
There is zero ‘woo woo’, and instead a fascinating set of theories on what exactly consciousness is, why it feels the way it does, what science can tell us now, and what remains unknown.
For me it is super fascinating from the point of view of why Vipassana works.
- collyw 8y agoI watched a youtube talk with Thomas Metzinger recently. The interviewer asked if he meditated. His response was "yes" (for a significant number of years that I can't remember), "that's how you can tell if someone is serious about the study, and not just interested in an academic career". I found that comment really interesting.
- kashyapc 8y agoInteresting that you mention Thomas Metzinger. I learned about him via a podcast he did with Sam Harris (who's mentioned on this thread a few times), titled "The Nature of Consciousness"[1]. From my faint recollection, Metzinger was refreshing to hear and had tighter explanations. And he called The Hard Problem of Consciousness[2] (as popularly defined by the Australian philosopher / congnitive scientist, David Chalmers) as "boring". I'm forgetting the details as to why, but it's all in the podcast. Thanks for the mention, I made a mental note to revisit Metzinger's work, but haven't gotten around. [1] https://samharris.org/podcasts/the-nature-of-consciousness/ https://samharris.org/podcasts/the-nature-of-consciousness/ [2] http://www.iep.utm.edu/hard-con/ http://www.iep.utm.edu/hard-con/