4 ms·

Literally untrue. If the facts aren't on your side, or you don't know them well enough to know whether they are or not, why even comment?

• mattbillenstein 8y ago
  The only real fact you cited isn't actually any sort of advantage for sourceforge over GH [1]. I don't think sourceforge has an open backend or any iota of accountability given their history of injecting malware. And I have no problem with a project not wanting to use github for this reason either - everyone is free to roll their own, or use something else, but the point stands that SF isn't exactly a better alternative for those reasons and most small projects should just end up on github because that's where a lot of OSS development has coalesced anyway and at least github has a been a decent steward providing free OSS project hosting. 1. "and the fact that GitHub is a closed source backend under control of a corporation that's accountable to no one"
  • carussell 8y ago
    So you've decided to double down on the not-knowing-what-you're-talking-about thing? It would have taken you less time to look up the relevant facts than typing out that comment. Besides that, the whole thing reeks of post-hoc argumentation. This will be my last comment in this thread.
    • mattbillenstein 8y ago
      Ok, I stand corrected -- it is OSS based on Apache Allura. 1. https://allura.apache.org/ https://allura.apache.org/