Jupyter is an amazing and useful piece of software. I agree that its openness is important, that its flexibility in producing content is excellent, and that it

Jupyter is an amazing and useful piece of software. I agree that its openness is important, that its flexibility in producing content is excellent, and that it deserves to be the current hotness. But I'm afraid > Now, Jupyter is the unambiguous technical leader. is pure fantasy, imho. SymPy is still two decades behind Mathematica in large swathes of symbolic computation. It may be that, for the things that the author wanted to do, the Python libraries were a good fit (it seems he was working on NLP), but overall, I just don't see it.