3 ms·
> If GDPR compliance was optional, how much would you pay for it? Another way to think about it: if non-toxic food was optional, how much would you pay for it?
by dozzie 9y ago
> If GDPR compliance was optional, how much would you pay for it?
Another way to think about it: if non-toxic food was optional, how much would
you pay for it? And how much would you pay for an access to a judical system?
It's not something that you want to have as an option.
- dominotw 9y agoFood and justice are not optional. Using Facebook is optional.
- dozzie 9y agoUsing services in general is de facto mandatory in our society. It's like saying that you don't need a bank account. In theory it could fly, but you'd be excluded from so many things that it's practically impossible. It's even less optional if you are required to use this or that service by your employer (e.g. company-wide Gmail). Going back to the analogy, you don't need to eat in this particular place, but how do you know any one you'd choose does not poison their food? By empty promises alone?
- montrose 9y agoIt's still a valid question though. And I would in fact pay far more for food with less toxins. Whereas I would pay little or nothing for e.g. a GDPR-compliant Twitter. So, interestingly, it's not only a valid question, but one that shows how overdone a comparison to toxic food is.