3 ms·
I'm guessing confirmation bias - if you were to see an HRD photo which wasn't ghastly, you wouldn't guess that it is HRD. Hence, thinking that there no non-ghas
by DougBTX 16y ago
I'm guessing confirmation bias - if you were to see an HRD photo which wasn't ghastly, you wouldn't guess that it is HRD. Hence, thinking that there no non-ghastly HDR photos.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Grand_Canyon_HDR_imaging.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Grand_Canyon_HDR_imaging.j...
Or better, one photo, 9 exposures:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:StPauls_cathedral_tonemapped.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:StPauls_cathedral_tonemapp...
- StavrosK 16y agoThe St. Paul's photo is the best example I've seen so far of HDR done right.
- mortenjorck 16y agoAs with any photographic technique, the technique alone doesn't guarantee anything. A good photographer will use the technique as a means to an end, while to a less skilled one the technique may simply be the end in and of itself.