4 ms·
It's sad that the top comment here is a conspiratorial hypothesis with game theory as a supporting argument. It seems wrong to cite game theory as evidence that
by ytNumbers 8y ago
It's sad that the top comment here is a conspiratorial hypothesis with game theory as a supporting argument. It seems wrong to cite game theory as evidence that a gas attack was unnecessary when that gas attack achieved victory by forcing the Douma rebels to, just hours later, agree to surrender. It's sickening to contemplate, but one could argue that in this case, the despicable use of chemical weapons brought a remarkably swift end to the fighting in Douma and in the longer term actually saved lives in that region of Syria.
http://www.dw.com/en/syria-rebels-evacuate-douma-under-new-agreement/a-43302957 http://www.dw.com/en/syria-rebels-evacuate-douma-under-new-a...
- amasad 8y agoThe biggest trick the devil ever pulled on smart people is to convince them that there are no conspiracies. ok On your point in Douma, the deal to evacuate was reached two weeks ago (about 10 days befoe the alleged attacks) https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN1H819H https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/... So it's more likely that the attack is false flag last ditch effort one. We all know that the civilians that the "rebels" hold are hostages. Even the article you cite says this much.
- ytNumbers 8y agohttp://www.businessinsider.com/syrias-assad-allegedly-used-gas-attacks-win-on-the-battlefield-2018-4 http://www.businessinsider.com/syrias-assad-allegedly-used-g...