3 ms·
Should have (2000) in the title. See https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1251250 https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1251250 for publication metadata.
by lobster_johnson 9y ago
Should have (2000) in the title. See https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1251250 https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1251250 for publication metadata.
- imglorp 9y agoCame here to say that. Why don't papers include the date and publication in the final text? It's frustrating. Speculating on my own question, in the Old Days a paper would get bound up in a paper book so there was no ambiguity. But this shouldn't stand in the Post Arxiv world - the standard LaTeX template should have standard slots for this on the front page.