4 ms·
It would be easier to "make" these with semantic web. Maybe your browser would just have some generic viewer so that you would not have to make any at all.
by nearmuse 9y ago
It would be easier to "make" these with semantic web. Maybe your browser would just have some generic viewer so that you would not have to make any at all.
- stephengillie 9y agoI'm writing a small JavaScript engine that converts websites to JSON, and displays JSON as websites. Since an entire site is described in the same JSON file, the whole site is a single download, and it rebuilds pages in the browser instead of calling the server - much faster, especially on mobile. If the browser had this small engine, it could render these sites natively.
- NetOpWibby 9y agoYour project sounds very interesting, is it hosted somewhere?
- stephengillie 9y agoThe site is in alpha, at https://www.sparational.com https://www.sparational.com. it has links to my GitHub, and to the site engine on S3. It started as a simple Node project to host a blog and a few random pages. Now, the goal is a single-page application, in more than one sense.
- nearmuse 9y agoNeat. But my comment is about the exact opposite: having a standard way to represent data in place of HTML and custom formats.