3 ms·

I feel like I see this on the internet more and more lately. Paragraph one starts with some shoddy, made up evidence where they mock some idea and then you look

I feel like I see this on the internet more and more lately. Paragraph one starts with some shoddy, made up evidence where they mock some idea and then you look for the start of paragraph 2 to figure out what they're really getting themselves upset about: "This is my biggest complaint with the "Right to Repair" movement." So yeah, have a problem with some group, reorganize information to make that group look bad and pretend like this thing you made up is a great illustration of the grudge you had against some people. But my question is, why?

ericabiz 9y ago
> Why? Because he’s a former Apple employee: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dpkonofa https://www.linkedin.com/in/dpkonofa
- dpkonofa 9y ago
  Why does that have any affect on my point? The article has been changed since it was originally posted. The original article had the guy claiming he was using genuine Apple parts which was stated right on the company's website (they've changed it since the case went to court): https://web.archive.org/web/20160327050030/http://www.pckompaniet.no:80/index.php/reparasjon-iphone-ipad/ https://web.archive.org/web/20160327050030/http://www.pckomp...
dpkonofa 9y ago
I appreciate you trying to discredit me instead of the argument I was making but the article has been modified since its posting. The original had a claim where the guy said he was using original, authorized Apple parts: [1] https://web.archive.org/web/20160327050030/http://www.pckompaniet.no:80/index.php/reparasjon-iphone-ipad/ https://web.archive.org/web/20160327050030/http://www.pckomp...
- ryguytilidie 8y ago
  "I appreciate you trying to discredit me instead of the argument I was making" I'll just go ahead and roll my eyes at this trash.