3 ms·
The Goldman Sachs analysts didn't ask an unreasonable question. What are absolutely dismal are the conditions that make it a reasonable question. And what makes
by danharaj 9y ago
The Goldman Sachs analysts didn't ask an unreasonable question. What are absolutely dismal are the conditions that make it a reasonable question. And what makes them dismal people is that they are totally cool being part of the system that makes such questions reasonable.
> In the absence of original source material, whatever interpretation you apply will inevitably be a projection of your pre-existing views on the matter.
Literally all interpretation one does about anything is a "projection" of their pre-existing views on the matter.
- Balgair 9y ago> What are absolutely dismal are the conditions that make it a reasonable question I'm a pretty free-market kinda guy, but all systems have flaws. Biotech and capitalism seem to have a fair few chasms between them, and this GS report illustrates one of them quite well. Capitalism is not a 'complete' theory, holes exist in it, as they do in all things. If anything, as the GP states, GS is pointing this one out. Suggestions for what to do about this 'hole in theory' are needed though; likely it's government funding (in a 'lighthouses' manner).