2 ms·
It is odd that this is google's responsibility. Why isn't this directed at the original source?
by spullara 9y ago
It is odd that this is google's responsibility. Why isn't this directed at the original source?
- lovich 9y agoBecause having this information wasn't the problem. The problem now is that anyone anywhere can have access to all the data about you at any time. The scale of the ability has changed the behavior. The same issue comes up with cops tracking cars. It was never an issue for society for a cop to tail someone driving on public roads because they could only follow a few people given the resources necessary to tail someone. Now they can buy a few cameras that track license plates and have real time tracking of _everyone_ on the road with the ability to store the data forever until they decide it's useful, which is has changed the actual results of cops being allowed to track people. This right to be forgotten used to exist simply because you had to put effort into finding out data about people. People could move to another town and restart their life. The courts in this case appear to be trying to reset tat status quo
- jakub-at 9y ago^ THIS!