If anybody, I think the provider, not the search engine should be obligated. He should be, but in many cases it's just not doable, because governments are loca

If anybody, I think the provider, not the search engine should be obligated. He should be, but in many cases it's just not doable, because governments are local and the Internet is global. I think it should be accepted as a fact. So maybe we need some rethinking. Maybe banning books was never a good idea, even if ideas presented there seemed dangerous, inconvenient and sometimes plainly false. To me the situation looks like this: A goes to the police station to report that B has stolen something. They are fully aware that there is no chance they can catch B, so they arrest A. I'm not saying that there is no problem, just that the solution they have chosen is worse than lack of any action.