4 ms·
The state doesn't have to have a monopoly on violence; as the use of private military contractors has proven.
by scottishfiction 8y ago
The state doesn't have to have a monopoly on violence; as the use of private military contractors has proven.
- Chaebixi 8y ago> The state doesn't have to have a monopoly on violence; as the use of private military contractors has proven. I don't think you know what the "[state] monopoly on violence" means. It does not mean all people authorized to use force are directly on the government payroll.
- fjsolwmv 8y agoRectang misused it first, by claiming "encouraging a marketplace of competing militia would not a viable approach. " Even though mercenary corporations are in fact competing militia.
- rectang 8y agoWhatever large portion of the military we are not comfortable contracting out is going to continue missing out on the efficiencies induced by marketplace competition.