4 ms·
> "He tells me the low tech ways are the most effective :\ " But they don't scale up with numbers or across geographically. The scary thing about automated pro
by glaberficken 9y ago
> "He tells me the low tech ways are the most effective :\ "
But they don't scale up with numbers or across geographically. The scary thing about automated processes of facial recognition is precisely the ability to scale to everyone and everywhere.
- lovetrump 9y agoThis and other automated tracking/recording/etc methods will basically make privacy a thing of the past. It should be illegal, because without privacy, there can't be democracy (see the Facebook scandals as an example).
- fiter 9y agoIsn't privacy/anonymity in a crowd just a thing of the present? In a small village, everyone knew who you were and knew your past.
- jerf 9y agoEven assuming everybody in that village knows everybody else to the degree that Facebook knows you, it is at least mutual; ol' Grandma Francine knows I'm foolin' around but I know what Grandma Francine got up to when she was my age and who her daughter's real dad is, too. What private things do you know about the people serving ads to you? Nothing. Yesterday I saw someone on HN discussing their download of info from Facebook, which is supposed to include what advertisers know what, and they found they couldn't even find the advertiser's company name in Google. And ol' Grandma Francine doesn't scale. Her bad behaviors can't bend the very social fabric of society, nor is she corrupting the public square by abusing her knowledge of the townspeople to sell them things and "nudge" them and manipulate them; Grandma Francine is very talkative but not necessarily that bright, certainly not "we hired every PhD who we could get our hands on and turned them loose with an open expense line to buy hardware with" sorts of smart and manipulative.
- barronli 9y agoBelieve it or not, the world is evolving to become smaller and like a small town gradually. Sad... no more curiousity about my neighbor towns
- znpy 9y agoIs it time to start advocating against social media?
- matz1 9y agoSo instead of privacy, I think we should push/work on transparency/openness on all side as much as possible. Facebook know everything about me, I want to know everything about facebook too.
- fjsolwmv 9y agoYou could move to a new village. For bonus points you call yourself a traveling preacher for instant credibility, or claim to be some famous person
- mark_edward 9y agoNot really. Many peasants in Europe for example were bound to the land. In addition, moving was even more devastating then than it can be now. Mutual aid and social networks were everything, outsiders not trusted.
- kristofferR 9y ago> It should be illegal, because without privacy, there can't be democracy (see the Facebook scandals as an example). Wouldn't surprise me if China essentially made privacy illegal some time in the future.
- lostlogin 9y ago> without privacy, there can't be democracy You would have to suspect that the Chinese government aren’t missing this aspect.
- lovetrump 9y agomaybe not, but those technologies are spreading everywhere... including license plate readers at every corners... which is why Steve Jobs didn't have one on his car... But he could have been tracked some other ways... with the wireless sensors in his tires for example (and most cars communicate wirelessly with the manufacturer)
- sizzle 9y agoNo license plates? How did he get away with this? Sounds interesting, got a source for further reading?
- vajrabum 9y agoThe first search result from "steve jobs no license plate". https://arstechnica.com/cars/2016/07/steve-jobs-loophole-closed-california-wants-temporary-license-plates/ https://arstechnica.com/cars/2016/07/steve-jobs-loophole-clo...
- potlee 9y agoAnything you say is going to sound dumb with that username