3 ms·
>the correct approach is to regulate what is advertised Wouldn't that contradict first amendment. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_to_the_United_
by dominotw 9y ago
>the correct approach is to regulate what is advertised
Wouldn't that contradict first amendment.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution#Political_speech https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_to_the_United_...
- klez 9y agoAs the article points out, that's already been done for cigarettes and tobacco products.
- karljtaylor 9y agoI could be wrong, but I've always suspected the only impact of ads like http://adage.com/article/cmo-strategy/anti-smoking-tv-ads-big-tobacco-forced-run/311379/ http://adage.com/article/cmo-strategy/anti-smoking-tv-ads-bi... are the padding they provide to the bottom line of the WPP shops.
- icebraining 9y agoEDIT: Nevermind, misread the thread
- quietbritishjim 9y agoThe top-level comment proposes banning political advertising, but this link talks about commercial advertising so (honest question) surely it doesn't apply?
- icebraining 9y agoYeah, I misread the top comment.