4 ms·
The first part of your point makes sense, the second less so. If you have a pay for no ads model, you would get wealthy users willing to pay for it, and poor us
by hndamien 9y ago
The first part of your point makes sense, the second less so. If you have a pay for no ads model, you would get wealthy users willing to pay for it, and poor users unwilling. Meaning you could ONLY advertise to people without money to buy your products. This is a less than ideal scenario for an advertiser.
- gtowey 9y agoPayday lenders, cash for gold, rent to own and many, many other businesses would disagree. Poverty is quite profitable to exploit because your customers often have no choice.