3 ms·
You could argue that it's not necessary but that's what it is. Yeah, that's the whole point I'm trying to make. That it's not necessary. That JS it no more spe
by bassman9000 9y ago
You could argue that it's not necessary but that's what it is.
Yeah, that's the whole point I'm trying to make. That it's not necessary. That JS it no more special than any other language, and that there are recent, real, practical examples of absolute disruption (Apple/Android app stores) which broke what we thought it was required to deliver content to users.
As per the one single application, that's a gross oversimplification.
- wvenable 9y agoNobody said JS is special but the point of the article is that code execution (of any kind) is unnecessary. The ironic part is that app store you're arguing for wouldn't even exist without the web. The web is what made Mac OS X viable for users to switch to it (and MS Office). The platform network affects that made Windows a monopoly have been drastically cut down by the web. > As per the one single application, that's a gross oversimplification. Says another person posting on a web application that runs on every platform out there.