4 ms·
It seems to me that you are criticizing JS as it were in 2005. There are well known -low overhead- solutions to all the 'problems' you identified.
by optimalKEK 8y ago
It seems to me that you are criticizing JS as it were in 2005. There are well known -low overhead- solutions to all the 'problems' you identified.
- darepublic 8y agoDespite being a js fan i don't think this criticism of the article is true. The critique applies equally to today as 2005 no? It seems that the article wants a language whose capabilities vs js are heavily neutered