>Cooperation and synergy isn't the same as authoritarianism. There's a reason that civilization and societies reached all major advances and discoveries, and

>Cooperation and synergy isn't the same as authoritarianism. There's a reason that civilization and societies reached all major advances and discoveries, and not hermits or tribes. You explicitly asked questions like, "how do you get people to win the game?" "How do you win it?" "What's the reward?" "How do you distribute it?" In other words, you wanted us to dictate what "winning" means, what the rewards are for winning, and how the rewards would be distributed. That's not cooperation, that's dictation. Each person may have their own definition of winning and as long as they're not infringing on the rights of another, they can do whatever they wish to accomplish their goal. >There's immense value in limiting overhead by delegating fundamental services into a collective pool. Please don't forcibly dictate to me what is valuable by forcing me into a system that maximizes what you personally find valuable. I will offer the same kindness in return. That is the crux of the problem with the set of questions you asked originally and why what I've said does fit into your response to OP.