4 ms·

I really don't understand that-- compared to the cost of developing and marketing the app itself, surely the cost to hire someone whose only qualification is th

I really don't understand that-- compared to the cost of developing and marketing the app itself, surely the cost to hire someone whose only qualification is that they be bilingual is trivial, and you would only need them for long enough for them to run through all the questions to double check they are correct.

jakobegger 9y ago
That‘s probably what they thought, too. If you just pick a random bilingual person and let them proofread your learning material you are going to end up with crappy learning materials. If you want good content, you need good editors, and they are neither cheap, nor easy to find. The reason why companies try to save money with editors is that they don‘t „scale“ (one dev and a designer can program an interface that can be used for 20.000 different questions, but you need a lot of people to come up with those questions)
- gowld 9y ago
  It's not hard to hire someone to notice that the comments are reporting errors.
- NegativeLatency 9y ago
  Not only good editors, but good editors who are also bilingual.
- stordoff 9y ago
  I'm not sure they've even gone that far. There are _plenty_ of long-standing complaints (on the Japanese course) that there are errors in the _English_ sentences, such as that they are grammatically wrong, or that you've translated something one way but later don't accept that as a correct answer. Just checking the comments, or proofreading the English sentences, would have caught most of them.
- noobly 9y ago
  Reading this thread, I'm lead to wonder if there's any open source, Wikipedia style (public editing) apps / sites / courses being developed? This would certainly combat the scaling issue, as Duolingo's comments seem to imply.
- freeloop10 9y ago
  Why do you need 20,000 questions, though, when a typical user isn't going to need that many?
gilrain 9y ago
Engineer's disease... "why hire an expert when we're already Engineers!"

jakobegger 9y ago

That‘s probably what they thought, too. If you just pick a random bilingual person and let them proofread your learning material you are going to end up with crappy learning materials. If you want good content, you need good editors, and they are neither cheap, nor easy to find. The reason why companies try to save money with editors is that they don‘t „scale“ (one dev and a designer can program an interface that can be used for 20.000 different questions, but you need a lot of people to come up with those questions)

gowld 9y ago
It's not hard to hire someone to notice that the comments are reporting errors.
NegativeLatency 9y ago
Not only good editors, but good editors who are also bilingual.
stordoff 9y ago
I'm not sure they've even gone that far. There are _plenty_ of long-standing complaints (on the Japanese course) that there are errors in the _English_ sentences, such as that they are grammatically wrong, or that you've translated something one way but later don't accept that as a correct answer. Just checking the comments, or proofreading the English sentences, would have caught most of them.
noobly 9y ago
Reading this thread, I'm lead to wonder if there's any open source, Wikipedia style (public editing) apps / sites / courses being developed? This would certainly combat the scaling issue, as Duolingo's comments seem to imply.
freeloop10 9y ago
Why do you need 20,000 questions, though, when a typical user isn't going to need that many?

gilrain 9y ago

Engineer's disease... "why hire an expert when we're already Engineers!"