3 ms·
>automation system Tesla autopilot is driver assist, not automated driving. If you want to put someone on trial, you first have to establish a crime. If the
by jklinger410 9y ago
>automation system
Tesla autopilot is driver assist, not automated driving.
If you want to put someone on trial, you first have to establish a crime.
If the crime is a bug in autopilot, then yes, Tesla is guilty.
If the crime is killing the driver of a vehicle because of an accident, then Tesla is not guilty.
We can talk about bugs in software outside of a manslaughter case.
- gamblor956 9y agoFirst and foremost, Tesla itself sells, and still sells, Autopilot as a self-driving system. Not all trials are criminal trials. Some are civil trials, meaning generally that a tort occurred and one person is suing another to recover damages. That is the most likely trial in this situation. If the crime is a bug in Autopilot, then an engineer at Tesla might be guilty of any number of crimes. How the driver dies doesn't particularly matter if the bug causes his death. But more likely, Tesla is liable for product defect resulting in the death of one customer and the near-death experiences of at least 3 other drivers. This isn't a manslaughter case. But it is a product liability case+negligence+libel+invasion of privacy+intentional infliction of emotional distress case when it didn't have to be, and those additional claims will likely destroy Tesla financially. Trial experts have been quoted as saying a verdict in excess of $100 million is likely if Tesla were stupid enough to go to trial (and right now, Musk is definitely being that stupid).