3 ms·
> This clueless banning/taxing/penalizing folks for living as they please is inconsistent with American values. More typical of nanny states and other less savo
by cies 9y ago
> This clueless banning/taxing/penalizing folks for living as they please is inconsistent with American values. More typical of nanny states and other less savory government styles.
Bollocks. Read your law books. Weed is only recently legal in some states. Ciggies are taxed heavily, so is petrol. Try walking butt naked in the streets.
My point: your values are arbitrary. And calling them American(TM) does not give them any credibility in my eyes. In fact what you are doing is similar to what you despise in others: setting some standard and calling it "universal" (ok US-niversal)
> To make it clear: what people eat and how they exercise is a very personal matter.
Except:
When there is a public healthcare system that takes care of you fuck up.
When advertising is everywhere shoving "eat unhealthy crap" messages into our collective sub-conscience.
When some sentient being needs to suffer/die/have-children-taken-away-at-birth/is-forcefully-impregnated-(also-called-rape)...
What I'm saying is that I see cases around me of diet not being a strictly personal choice. I think if you try hard you can see it too. It's not so black-white as you make yourself believe.
- JoeAltmaier 9y agoFood is different. Very different. Blurring that with strawmen is easy but not helpful.