2 ms·
Zuckerberg is the one being disingenuous. By acknowledging cookie tracking or scraper tracking, he answers the question that indeed FB tracks offline usage, but
by wavesounds 8y ago
Zuckerberg is the one being disingenuous. By acknowledging cookie tracking or scraper tracking, he answers the question that indeed FB tracks offline usage, but only mentions the innocuous cases and fails to acknowledge the Shadow Profiles[1] they clearly have
1. https://www.dailydot.com/news/facebook-shadow-profiles-privacy-faq/ https://www.dailydot.com/news/facebook-shadow-profiles-priva...
- fixermark 8y agoHe actually mentions both in the original quote (if Bloomberg was sourcing to the section of the hearing I assume they're sourcing from).
- ameister14 8y agoHe acknowledged that they made shadow profiles and collected information not necessary for security from people who did not possess facebook accounts?