2 ms·
I like the idea, but I must admit that (with my background of a mathematics researcher, but almost completely ignorant of quantum physics and quantum physicists
by giomasce 8y ago
I like the idea, but I must admit that (with my background of a mathematics researcher, but almost completely ignorant of quantum physics and quantum physicists' notations) it is rather difficult to understand. In particular the bra-ket notation (which to me is already difficult due to its breaking the obvious way to match parentheses, but this might just require some time) seems to be used inconsistently across the paper (I believe that different authors wrote about the different algorithms, and the variations are rather evident and unhelpful). There are some formulas of which I cannot make any sense (last example I found: in the definition of QFT inside Shor's algorithm, the k inside the ket ranges from 0 to N-1, while according to the introduction it should range on all the combinations of a certain number of qubits).
Also, some authors seem to take for granted some concepts (such as the properties of the quantum gates) that are not explained anywhere and not obvious to me.
Still, an interesting read.
- mathgenius 8y agoI'm not sure if this is open to the public yet, but if you really are interested you could post your questions here: https://quantumcomputing.stackexchange.com/ https://quantumcomputing.stackexchange.com/
- selimthegrim 8y agothese might help https://uw.hosted.panopto.com/Panopto/Pages/Viewer.aspx?id=150299d8-5852-46b8-9f7c-a86001320a04 https://uw.hosted.panopto.com/Panopto/Pages/Viewer.aspx?id=1... https://uw.hosted.panopto.com/Panopto/Pages/Viewer.aspx?id=6ec5c14e-6eb1-43da-ab99-a8600132129b https://uw.hosted.panopto.com/Panopto/Pages/Viewer.aspx?id=6...
- tezthenerd 8y agoTry reading "Q is for Quantum", by the end of Part I you will understand one quantum algorithm thoroughly. All necessary gates are explained carefully and the linear algebra gets sneaked in without using bras and kets and so on...