6 ms·
Does anyone know if they will be carying out test launches in UK, or will they need to ship the rockets elsewhere to test them?
by zkirill 9y ago
Does anyone know if they will be carying out test launches in UK, or will they need to ship the rockets elsewhere to test them?
- robin_reala 9y agoThis is an engine, not a rocket.
- igravious 9y agoFirst line of the article: “REL, based at Culham in Oxfordshire, is working on a propulsion system that is part jet engine, part rocket engine.”
- twic 9y agoI assume that robin_reala means that this is a motor, not a vehicle. So you don't need to do launches to a useful orbit as part of development. Or production - you can sell the motor to someone who wants to build a spaceplane. That said, my understanding is that Reaction Engines plans to build the spaceplane too, although if someone else with more expertise came along and wanted to do that, i imagine they would be open to it.
- igravious 9y agoThat wasn't my interpretation but I'm open to yours, thanks!
- IIAOPSW 9y agoUK is at a bad latitude for launching into orbit. Maybe Gibraltar?
- NLips 9y agoNot much better. I believe a bunch (all?) of ESA launches go from French Guiana, so my guess is that might be the easiest place to go for orbital launches for a British company.
- xchaotic 9y agoIt used to be easier before Brexit. Nowadays the might bad well launch from Kazakhstan
- rospaya 9y agoESA isn't an EU agency, it's independent.
- twic 9y agoYou could say the same about Euratom, but we're leaving that, because membership requires accepting the authority of the European Court of Justice in some areas. I wouldn't be surprised if there were minor entanglements that made continuing to play a major part in ESA difficult.
- vidarh 9y agoEuratom is in a very special situation there in that the treaties related to Euratom makes it subject to ECJ jurisdiction, which is one of the "red lines" of the UK government. ESA is not in the same situation and e.g. Norway is a member of ESA and Canada sits on the ESA council under a Cooperation Agreement.
- RugnirViking 9y agoYep, completely impossible to have any diplomatic relations with any nations at all post-brexit. No possible way they'd like to get the tourism and investment that comes from space launches. Lets not be silly, as much as brexit was foolish, the UK will still work in the ESA closely and will still be on very good terms with the vast majority of nations on the planet.
- isostatic 9y agoAcension Island, maybe St Helena, if the goal is to keep the launch pad in "British territory"
- Gravityloss 9y agoNot so bad for polar orbit. They are planning orbital launches from northern Norway and Sweden too.
- robin_reala 9y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spaceport_Sweden https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spaceport_Sweden for more information.
- d33 9y ago> UK is at a bad latitude for launching into orbit. Why? What would happen if one tried?
- IIAOPSW 9y agoThe closer you are to the equator, the less lateral boosting you need to do because Earths spin helps you out. Less boost = less fuel. That's why the US launches from Florida and the Soviets used to launch from Kazakhstan
- mnw21cam 9y agoIt depends what type of orbit you want to enter. If you launch from a high latitude, and thrust directly East, then you end up with an orbit that has a declination that brings you back to that same latitude. You can increase the orbital declination by thrusting in a different direction than pure East, but it isn't possible to decrease the declination without effectively turning a corner over the equator. Turning a corner in orbit takes a huge amount of delta-v, making the rocket much bigger and more expensive. Therefore, the UK is not a sensible place to launch from if you want an equatorial orbit, but it's fine for a polar orbit.
- woodandsteel 9y agoThe launch trajectory would take the rocket over France. I don't know if the UK government would consider that a plus or a minus. </humor>
- OrganicMSG 9y agoHistorically we used to launch from Woomera, before we shut everything down as part of the deal giving us access to US nuclear missile tech, something our politicians were happy to do as they thought that missiles was all rockets were really for anyway. Which I think ranks as one of the stupidest decisions the UK has ever made.
- detritus 9y agoNo, never. The runway's too short, the turning circle into the bay too right, the proximity and politics with their spanish neighbour too tricky.
- twic 9y agoThe UK is at a bad latitude for launching into equatorial orbits, but a good latitude for launching into polar orbits. Polar orbits, and their relatives, such as sun-synchronous orbits, are useful for various kinds of missions. For example, earth observation missions, because they overfly every point on Earth, and missions where you need a continuous view of the sun, for solar power or observation.
- andygates 9y agoThe (still paper) Skylon proposal is a huge beastie vehicle that will need a very long, strong special runway. One nice thing about the vehicle is how it can make a huge range of orbits by just steering the plane before its fast ascent phase. That means it could be in the UK, as some of the challenges with orbital launches are avoided.
- walshemj 9y agoShould have kept twinwoods then :-) also there is that last dich emergency abort strip for the shuttle up in Scotland.
- OrganicMSG 9y agoPrestwick. Concorde used to land there sometimes. I know someone who was in the process of landing a microlight at Prestwick when concorde had to fly in because of bad weather at Heathrow.
- skykooler 9y agoA microlight? That could probably land going crossways across that runway!
- timthorn 9y agoThe UK government has plans to develop a spaceport and has been considering a list of locations including in Scotland, Wales and Cornwall. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/industry-backs-governments-spaceport-plans https://www.gov.uk/government/news/industry-backs-government...