4 ms·
Apple couldn't have gone straight to 64-bit apps on Intel--the OS and frameworks just weren't ready yet. The Intel machines shipped starting with 10.4.3, which
by mrpippy 9y ago
Apple couldn't have gone straight to 64-bit apps on Intel--the OS and frameworks just weren't ready yet. The Intel machines shipped starting with 10.4.3, which only supported 64-bit command-line apps/daemons. Only with 10.5 (released in late 2007, 18 months after the first Intel machines) were full graphical 64-bit apps supported (on both ppc64 and x86_64).
- wtallis 9y agoFirmware was an issue, too. The first generation of Macs with 64-bit processors still used 32-bit EFI and booted a 32-bit kernel that could run 64-bit applications.
- mrpippy 9y agoTrue, it wasn't until 10.6 that a 64-bit kernel was available, and only newer machines got to use it. https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2009/08/mac-os-x-10-6/5/ https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2009/08/mac-os-x-10-6/5/
- yuhong 9y agoI had a blog article about the entire mess that was often confused (there was actually three modes): http://yuhongbao.blogspot.ca/2009/09/mac-os-xs-64-bit-modes.html http://yuhongbao.blogspot.ca/2009/09/mac-os-xs-64-bit-modes....