3 ms·

>There's so much money involved here and so much initial traction that it is indeed reasonable to think that tech can surpass a "normal" driver. I don't think

>There's so much money involved here and so much initial traction that it is indeed reasonable to think that tech can surpass a "normal" driver. I don't think it is reasonable at all to reach that conclusion based on the money involved...You just can't force progress/breakthrough just by throwing money at all problem.. >I'm also biased against human drivers, plenty of whom should not be behind the wheel. So I think it would be quite trivial to drastically increase the punishment of dangerous practices if caught. I mean, suspend license or ban for life if you are caught texting while driving or drunk driving.

pstuart 9y ago
Money absolutely matters. If there's no money, there's no development. And vice versa. That funded development isn't a guarantee of success, but it raises the odds to be non-zero. You're also ignoring a key point: we have "self-driving" cars right now, but they're not good enough yet. Computer hardware is getting cheaper day by day, and right now the limiting factor appears to be the cost of sensors.
- buvanshak 9y ago
  >Money absolutely matters. If there's no money, there's no development. And vice versa. Both are not true. It does not need money for a man to have a great breakthrough idea. It is also not possible to guarantee generation a great idea by just throwing more and more money at researchers...