4 ms·
1. MS is all about "piles of legacy." That is not counter to their philosophy at all. 2. MS apparently sees some long-term advantage to having a Linux compatibi
by sverige 9y ago
1. MS is all about "piles of legacy." That is not counter to their philosophy at all.
2. MS apparently sees some long-term advantage to having a Linux compatibility layer. (By "advantage," I mean of course some way to make more money.)
Neither of these things has any bearing on the quality of Linux, or lack thereof.