4 ms·
We need FAA style oversight on self driving cars.
by wehadfun 8y ago
We need FAA style oversight on self driving cars.
- Robotbeat 8y agoThis isn't self-driving, though. It isn't called self-driving.
- brain_dev 8y agoHow else would you describe an Automatically Piloted Vehicle then? If it's not self-driving, don't call it Autopilot, and don't lull people into a false sense of security. Even with alarms to try and keep the driver engaged, people are inherently going to place more faith in 'Autopilot' than 'Enhanced Cruise Control' or something similarly named. The marketing around this feature is reckless, and Tesla + Musk should be ashamed. To the point that I would consider working on that team to be immoral. For what it's worth, this is coming from a big Musk fan.
- Robotbeat 8y agoIt’s called autopilot because “autopilot” already has a technical meaning which doesn’t imply self-driving. Heck, some aircraft autopilots are so primitive they only keep the aircraft in level flight without terrain following (although some do that). No versions of autopilot mean the pilot doesn’t have to pay attention. This is all already established through broad use before Tesla introduced the term to cars. The same linguistic games you’re trying to play for “autopilot” apply just as well to “cruise control” or worse, since that term didn’t have an already-understood technical definition when introduced to cars.
- chaboud 8y agoI think the NTSB examined the crash, so there's at least some federal oversight.
- gsnedders 8y agoThe NTSB have an ongoing investigation into the crash.