I'd love a link to someone "debunking" Peterson, as he is just another scale on the ouroboros that is philosophical critique of the human experience. I'm quite

I'd love a link to someone "debunking" Peterson, as he is just another scale on the ouroboros that is philosophical critique of the human experience. I'm quite interested in the topic, but I am loathe to engage in the meta-representation of the topic; I wish to discuss messages not messengers. Though there is maple in my blood I am not who you seek to disparage. I believe the most effective social organization strategies evolved are religion and nationalism, with religion being the simplest and nationalism being the strongest. I do not believe in an evolutionary stairway to enlightenment, rather a shifting physical world that creates arbitrary "final exams" for species that wish to continue proliferation. Ideas evolve like biological life forms, and meta-analysis is not a determining factor in the survival of ideas without the addition of death squads and concentration camps. With this as a point of departure, there is no precedent for social organization that can claim consistent superiority over any other. Each has a matched set of strengths and weaknesses that exhibit or recess depending on the situation under review. I firmly believe that the core criteria for a "working idea" is that it propagates generationally, through actors either cognizant or ignorant of it. Past that, all observable attributes are valued based on a particular situation, not a connected series of events (rather, a dialectic).