3 ms·
Why wouldn’t they put him under oath? That just seems weird: the cost of doing it is zero.
by briandear 9y ago
Why wouldn’t they put him under oath? That just seems weird: the cost of doing it is zero.
- tareqak 9y agoYeah. I'd even go further and say that if you are giving testimony in Congress and answering questions, then you should automatically be under oath unless Congress explicitly waives that requirement before the session.
- jrs95 9y agoPerhaps this is more of a show than the real thing
- Lionsion 9y agoHe came without being subpoenaed, so not putting him under oath may have been a courtesy. Many of the congressmen thanked him for coming on his own accord.
- ng-user 9y agoThe cost for them is 0, the cost for MZ is incredibly high. I don't think he would have agreed if he was under oath.
- 0x00000000 9y agoPossible that if they did every single answer would be "I don't know the exact details, my team will get back to you"
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]