3 ms·
> "- Python 3.7 performs about as well as 2.7 with future release expected to be better" are you sure on that? my laptop (2.7 ghz 4 cores, 16gb ram) would fall
by autokad 9y ago
> "- Python 3.7 performs about as well as 2.7 with future release expected to be better"
are you sure on that? my laptop (2.7 ghz 4 cores, 16gb ram) would fall behind my desktop (3.8 ghz 6 cores, 64 gb ram) because it would be paging things in and out of ram, but once the models started running (like XGBOOST), py2x was about twice as fast.
I am not stating this with difinity, because I was not trying to benchmark the two. Just that I casually noted my laptop would always finnish running the same code in 1 hour vs over 2 hours on my desktop.