4 ms·

So how do you suggest we solve the problem without collective actions? What "changes on an individual level" do you think need to occur, and how do you expect t

So how do you suggest we solve the problem without collective actions? What "changes on an individual level" do you think need to occur, and how do you expect them to come about? Because to me, it seems like the individualist's prescription is just to judge people for making bad choices and hope they make better ones in future.

throwaway413 9y ago
I hear you - but hopefully the individualists prescription is really one they are taking themselves and not forcing onto others, but leading by example. Collective action is just a bunch of individual actions. Yes there is power in syncing up, regardless, it still stems from an individuals decision to take action, with or without others.
mygo 9y ago
The individual is the functional unit of society. When you choose to address society, what you’re really doing, if it’s going to work, is addressing the individuals of that society. Address a bunch of individuals. Or address one individual and have him address 2 people he knows. Etc. More than one way to skin a cat... TLDR; to skin a society of cats, one way or another, each individual cat needs to get skinned.
- aninhumer 9y ago
  Saying "society is just individuals" is reductive to the point of uselessness though. People exist within a system of social and economic realities, and the choices they make, indeed the choices they can make, are shaped by that system. And therefore, many choices which would improve society only make sense as collective choices. An individual deciding whether to delete their facebook account is deciding between privacy violation or social isolation. In that context, the privacy violation might actually be the better choice for the individual. When people criticise that choice, they're noticing that collectively it would be better if everyone made a different choice. But it's pointless to blame individuals for not making a collective choice. If we actually want people to make that choice, we need to act collectively, and transition away from facebook in a coordinated way.
  - mygo 9y ago
    ??? Re-read what I wrote, and then name something I wrote that goes against what you have said about collective action and coordination. For starters, I did not say “society is just individuals.” I said that the individual is the functional unit of society. When you want society to act on something, what you’re really saying is that you want individuals of a group to act on that, collectively. When you command an army you’re effectively commanding each individual soldier.. as the soldier is the functional unit of the army. When you want the army to move from one side of the valley to the other, what that translates to is for each individual soldier to move from one side of the valley to the other. If someone is petitioning for social change and fails to lead individuals - the functional units - to change, then there’s not much happening at all besides someone blowing hot air at “society”

throwaway413 9y ago

I hear you - but hopefully the individualists prescription is really one they are taking themselves and not forcing onto others, but leading by example. Collective action is just a bunch of individual actions. Yes there is power in syncing up, regardless, it still stems from an individuals decision to take action, with or without others.

mygo 9y ago

The individual is the functional unit of society. When you choose to address society, what you’re really doing, if it’s going to work, is addressing the individuals of that society. Address a bunch of individuals. Or address one individual and have him address 2 people he knows. Etc. More than one way to skin a cat... TLDR; to skin a society of cats, one way or another, each individual cat needs to get skinned.

aninhumer 9y ago
Saying "society is just individuals" is reductive to the point of uselessness though. People exist within a system of social and economic realities, and the choices they make, indeed the choices they can make, are shaped by that system. And therefore, many choices which would improve society only make sense as collective choices. An individual deciding whether to delete their facebook account is deciding between privacy violation or social isolation. In that context, the privacy violation might actually be the better choice for the individual. When people criticise that choice, they're noticing that collectively it would be better if everyone made a different choice. But it's pointless to blame individuals for not making a collective choice. If we actually want people to make that choice, we need to act collectively, and transition away from facebook in a coordinated way.
- mygo 9y ago
  ??? Re-read what I wrote, and then name something I wrote that goes against what you have said about collective action and coordination. For starters, I did not say “society is just individuals.” I said that the individual is the functional unit of society. When you want society to act on something, what you’re really saying is that you want individuals of a group to act on that, collectively. When you command an army you’re effectively commanding each individual soldier.. as the soldier is the functional unit of the army. When you want the army to move from one side of the valley to the other, what that translates to is for each individual soldier to move from one side of the valley to the other. If someone is petitioning for social change and fails to lead individuals - the functional units - to change, then there’s not much happening at all besides someone blowing hot air at “society”