From the study : "For the action 'have one fewer child,' we relied on a study which quantified future emissions of descendants " Now imagine people taking the

From the study : "For the action 'have one fewer child,' we relied on a study which quantified future emissions of descendants " Now imagine people taking the plane, say 40 times in their life : 401.6 = 64 and living car free half during, say 40 years : 2.4 0.5 * 40 = 48 => total = 64+48=112. So by changing the way of life, you can make as much as your "one child fewer" proposal. What I say is that the "one child" scenario is not much better than changing the way we live.