> If you use ugly C-style loops instead of nicer native for loops, your loop will run 2x faster. This is what I currently consider a workaround. At the moment

> If you use ugly C-style loops instead of nicer native for loops, your loop will run 2x faster. This is what I currently consider a workaround. At the moment if you have a constant endpoint and it fits in a native int, such as `for ^10`, it is already highly optimized and actually runs faster than the equivalent in Perl 5. That is not done yet where the endpoint is a native int variable. :-(