> That doesn't seem quite fair to the manufacturer to me. That's exactly why the law was changed. The balance of power was initially on the manufacturer's side

> That doesn't seem quite fair to the manufacturer to me. That's exactly why the law was changed. The balance of power was initially on the manufacturer's side. All they had to do was say "1 year warranty" and everyone was out of luck if/when it failed. Consumers were required to upgrade and buy a replacement product. Now the balance of power is on the consumer's side. Most of the time TVs will last 5+ years, but in the case where it doesn't, and lots fail early due to a manufacturing issue - then the cost (is rightly) put back on to the manufacturer. It forces them to stand by their product, ensuring the quality is up to a good standard. They must use quality long lasting components and make sure their testing process is up to scratch. Otherwise they will be up for the cost to remedy that. If they make sure their product doesn't fail early, the cost is minimal to them. So this changes their mindset in terms of the manufacturing and design processes.