3 ms·
> With no persuasive/coercive force - why would they do it. The article says it should be required to submit a paper in the first place - I'd imagine that'd be
by Mononokay 9y ago
> With no persuasive/coercive force - why would they do it.
The article says it should be required to submit a paper in the first place - I'd imagine that'd be incentive enough.
- aurizon 9y agoWatch our for circles of reviewers who are not capable, but are willing to act as reviewers on each other in a network to validate their group. Far fetched??, not at all, it had been done and continues to be done. Elsevier et all, did a good job with their peers and glory reward method, so a system that replaces it need to be well thought out in depth to stand permanently. Elsevier just sucks and sucks and sucks, like US drug makers