3 ms·
Because this would be at least 5 times slower to transfer compared to regular image formats, and on mobile a lot of energy goes to power the screen (while user
by pornel 9y ago
Because this would be at least 5 times slower to transfer compared to regular image formats, and on mobile a lot of energy goes to power the screen (while user is staring at a blank one, waiting for data) and radios (which now have 5x more work to do).
JPEG XS has severe restrictions of realtime encoding and a 30-line buffer, which are necessary for its goals, but make it a bad choice for anything that doesn't have such limitations.
- matte_black 9y agoIs it a bad choice, or an impossible choice? Because if it’s possible to send one over the web, I would like to see it rendered with my own eyes. Speed be damned.