3 ms·
I don't believe for a second that this much fuss would have been made over this issue if Trump had lost the election. Some law enforcement action may have been
by Consultant32452 9y ago
I don't believe for a second that this much fuss would have been made over this issue if Trump had lost the election. Some law enforcement action may have been taken, but it wouldn't have been front page news. The reason for my quotes is that Trump is "unapproved" which is the explanation for the scale of the reaction. I don't particularly approve of him either, but considering the real motivations of the people writing regulation is important.
- singingboyo 9y agoOf course there wouldn't be as much fuss about it. Trump losing the election would imply that the attempts at influencing people were unsuccessful. At a glance, that would indicate that regulation is unnecessary (though detailed analysis could show otherwise).
- Consultant32452 9y agoForeign spending on political FB ads was a drop in the ocean. Especially when you consider it played to both sides (acknowledge it leaned towards Trump), was not all in swing states, and a lot of it was after the election. This is almost certainly not about them.
- bimr 9y agoSo, in other words, only regulate to prevent challengers. This is precisely what Facebook and the political establishment hope to achieve.