3 ms·
"What if the plasticity of the connections was under the control of the network itself, as it seems to be in biological brains through the influence of neuromod
by no_identd 9y ago
"What if the plasticity of the connections was under the control of the network itself, as it seems to be in biological brains through the influence of neuromodulators?"
Anyone who wishes to explore this idea would do well to go back to the basics of neural nets and read Warren McCulloch's seminal papers on neural nets, from the 40s:
http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~coquand/AUTOMATA/mcp.pdf http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~coquand/AUTOMATA/mcp.pdf A Logical Calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity
http://vordenker.de/ggphilosophy/mcculloch_heterarchy.pdf http://vordenker.de/ggphilosophy/mcculloch_heterarchy.pdf A heterarchy of values determined by the topology of neural nets
(After having read those two papers, one can then try to make sense of Heinz von Förster's masterpiece, http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/archive/fulltexts/1270.pdf http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/archive/fulltexts/127..., Objects: Tokens for (Eigen-)Behaviors, which also bears some relevance to this matter. However, most people find it incomprehensible.)
- nairboon 9y agoThank you for those papers! Do you have some further suggestions that build upon Försters idea?
- no_identd 9y agoTry anything citing von Förster's paper that was written by: • Louis H. Kauffman if you're mostly interested in the pure math aspect of it. He wrote numerous papers on the topic of von Förster's paper, you can find one them here: https://arxiv.org/abs/1109.1892 https://arxiv.org/abs/1109.1892 • JM Stern and CAB Pereira if you're mostly interested in the application to statistics and fundamental questions of the epistemology of statistics. I wrote a thread on their works on my Twitter account at some point: https://twitter.com/no_identd/status/877883663014400000 https://twitter.com/no_identd/status/877883663014400000 Try this AMAZING paper by AF Zimpel: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdf/10.1108/03684920510581701 http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdf/10.1108/03684920510581... Also, this paper by Heinz von Förster (first order author) and Karl H. Miiller (second order editor), where Miller basically took a lot of old papers by von Förster and rearranged them to give a more coherent view for certain types of readers: http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/archive/fulltexts/3098.pdf http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/archive/fulltexts/309...
- trisimix 9y agoOh god my Im going to bomb finals if I read this
- guskel 9y agoDon't bother. Reading through the third link reveals that it's more alike thoughts during an opiate induced dream dressed in flowery language than actual science. Disappointing, really.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- no_identd 9y agoSounds like you struggle with the math notation and with the epistemological concepts involved. Did you read & comprehend the two papers linked before trying to make sense of it? If so, mind sharing your notes? Pretty sure you must have taken some if you claim to have comprehended them.