> Consumers are free to visit any competitor site with identical ease of accessibility and competitors have very few barriers to entry I would strongly disagre

> Consumers are free to visit any competitor site with identical ease of accessibility and competitors have very few barriers to entry I would strongly disagree with this characterization of the market. From joe_the_user's link [1] on oligopolies, every item under Barriers to Entry: Artificial Barriers applies to large, network-effect web companies. Google Takeout is probably the guiding light on fighting this, but were Google no longer in a dominant market position I'm not confident it would remain a corporate emphasis. ... Ironically, this same debate (regulating ISP vs edge provider) just came up in Zuckerberg's Senate questioning.