2 ms·
Low-quality, buzzword-filled blogspam for https://jpeg.org/jpegxs/ https://jpeg.org/jpegxs/ Some presentations and/or papers: [1] 'Introduction to JPEG XS - T
by niftich 9y ago
Low-quality, buzzword-filled blogspam for https://jpeg.org/jpegxs/ https://jpeg.org/jpegxs/
Some presentations and/or papers:
[1] 'Introduction to JPEG XS - The New Low Complexity Codec Standard for Professional Video Production', Fraunhofer IIS & intoPIX SA, https://www.ibc.org/download?ac=3823 https://www.ibc.org/download?ac=3823 (pdf)
[2] 'JPEG XS, a new standard for visually lossless low-latency lightweight image compression', Fraunhofer IIS, http://publica.fraunhofer.de/documents/N-479925.html http://publica.fraunhofer.de/documents/N-479925.html (login and/or paywall) (pdf)
[3] JPEG XS workplan from 2016, JPEG, https://jpeg.org/downloads/jpegxs/wg1n71031-REQ-JPEG_XS_Call_for_proposals.pdf https://jpeg.org/downloads/jpegxs/wg1n71031-REQ-JPEG_XS_Call... (pdf)
Essentially, a low-loss, partially-wavelet video format heavily implied to be applicable for pro video, in the vein of VC-2/Dirac.
- pvg 9y agoIt's just different article aimed at a different audience, it's not in any way 'blogspam'.
- niftich 9y agoIt's an article from a school whose faculty member leads JPEG. It namedrops VR, space agencies, 5G; vaguely alludes to some upcoming work, links to nowhere of interest -- it's university press release mixed with quasi-marketing undertones you'd find in a business magazine. I think we should strive for better sources than this, so I provided some.
- pvg 9y agoStriving for better sources doesn't mean misrepresenting sources. The university press release might not be to your taste but it's not 'blogspam' - it's not a lifted copy of the sources you are suggesting.