What troubles me about the Irvine case, is that it sounds like every other "concerned" group across the country when it comes to homelessness. No to tents, no t

What troubles me about the Irvine case, is that it sounds like every other "concerned" group across the country when it comes to homelessness. No to tents, no to shelters in the neighborhood, no to homeless sleeping on the benches, etc. Everyone, it seems, wants the problem to go some place else, but no community, particularly in Silicon Valley, has stood up (to my knowledge and please correct me if I'm wrong here) that the homeless people of a community are PART of that community, and the community should embrace them, and integrate them. Perhaps I'm overly optimistic...