3 ms·
*She ---but yeah, as a first-order approximation, that's in the vicinity of it. Thanks!
by gone35 9y ago
*She ---but yeah, as a first-order approximation, that's in the vicinity of it. Thanks!
- p1esk 9y agoOk, so this would lead to restricting initial access to strong AI to a few well funded corporate and government groups. Very briefly though, because it's way easier to leak code than to obtain source material and tools to weaponize a deadly virus.
- nunya213 9y agoThe exact details on how to make a Thermonuclear weapon are classified, do you think that is done so improperly?
- p1esk 9y agoAre you comparing building a nuclear bomb to running a piece of code?
- YeGoblynQueenne 9y agoWell, it depends on the piece of code, doesn't it? How many people can actually run Google's search engine on their own hardware? Assuming they had access to the code.
- p1esk 9y agoSee my response above.
- nunya213 9y agoWe are talking about an actual AGI right which certainly has the potential to do damage comparable to Nuclear Weapons.
- gone35 9y agoVery briefly though, because it's way easier to leak code than to obtain source material and tools to weaponize a deadly virus. True, but perhaps AGI would require substantial, non-trivial supercomputing resources as well...
- p1esk 9y agoLet's say you need 1000 of p3.16xlarge instances to run it (that's 8k of V100 GPUs), that's $25,000/hour. So the launch price is within reach of most US programmers. After launch, a true AGI can probably find a way to stay "alive".