I'm not sure if you read the entire book, but I don't think that this is a fair assessment of the main thesis the Author makes. Of course we are not in a post-

I'm not sure if you read the entire book, but I don't think that this is a fair assessment of the main thesis the Author makes. Of course we are not in a post-scarcity world. Capital itself will always be scarce by definition. The question is: If time is not longer a viable means to obtain capital, how to adjust societal norms to compensate?