3 ms·
> I think when the circumstances actually show someone was grossly negligent, it's very hard to convincingly pretend that only processes are to blame. On the c
by solatic 9y ago
> I think when the circumstances actually show someone was grossly negligent, it's very hard to convincingly pretend that only processes are to blame.
On the contrary - the entire reason why you transition from culture to process as you grow is because when you measure by results, there's no difference between unintentional negligence (leaving a production terminal open à la Travis), intentional negligence (let me bystep this annoying check, let me procrastinate on fixing the backups a la GitLab), and malice.
If you get large enough, you will have grossly negligent people, by statistical inevitability. You can either accept this statistical inevitability and design your process for it or you can continue to believe that you (and everybody else) really actually do only ever hire the very best.
- subway 9y agoGP is pretty clearly talking about blaming the company (processes) and not individuals. The entire post laments the fact that entities external to the company will repeatedly forgive the company if the company goes through the motion of publishing a blameless post-mortem. Even if those post-mortems repeatedly indicate the company really didn't learn anything, or change the processes that led up to the incident. But by golly, they're forward thinking company, and therefore blameless.