3 ms·
Well, it is from 2008. And it does mention Clojure and explains why it's not going to discuss it ("still in an exploratory beta-stage right now", which I'm gues
by gjm11 16y ago
Well, it is from 2008. And it does mention Clojure and explains why it's not going to discuss it ("still in an exploratory beta-stage right now", which I'm guessing was true when the article was written) but says it's "definitely a project to keep your eyes on going forward". So if you meant anything other than "This article is from 2008", I think you may not be being quite fair.
- cageface 16y agoIt's not a criticism of the article, but the article does seem a lot less relevant now.