6 ms·

So... if its usefulness is equal to something you've made, AND it's available to the public, AND it's more polished... why exactly are you shitposting about it?

So... if its usefulness is equal to something you've made, AND it's available to the public, AND it's more polished... why exactly are you shitposting about it? Let people enjoy things.

didymospl 9y ago
I just pointed out that this is a very basic code. It's definitely not something I would use in any real life scenario(see other posts itt). And if you want to learn about NN you'd be better off googling something like 'backpropagation example' as this project does is virtually not documented. I personally don't find it useful and it takes up the space that can be filled with more interesting content. How is that 'shitposting'?
- hoffa 9y ago
  It's a refreshingly clean, tiny library without dependencies that can do some cool stuff. Let people like things. Stop shitposting.
  - glouwbug 9y ago
    Thankyou for the kind words.
nl 9y ago
It's not shitposting. One of the core requirements of modern deep neural networks is performance. The high accuracy you get from very fast training over large amounts of data is the only reason to look at neural networks over very fast, very accurate systems like XGBoost. If something doesn't deliver that, then it's worth pointing out that it is inadequate for anything but toy tasks.
- foldr 9y ago
  It's not really worth pointing this out when the thing in question is a 200 line C library. People won't be expecting it to save the world and/or butter their toast.
  - kuroguro 9y ago
    +1 also these tiny libraries are great for learning the basics. All of the code has actual meaning behind it and it's super easy to get it up and running.
    - p1esk 9y ago
      No. You definitely don't want to look at C code when you want to learn NN basics.
sctb 9y ago
Please make your point without gratuitous inflammation like “shitposting”. Its effect on the threads should be apparent, and we're trying for better here.

So... if its usefulness is equal to something you've made, AND it's available to the public, AND it's more polished... why exactly are you shitposting about it? Let people enjoy things.

didymospl 9y ago

I just pointed out that this is a very basic code. It's definitely not something I would use in any real life scenario(see other posts itt). And if you want to learn about NN you'd be better off googling something like 'backpropagation example' as this project does is virtually not documented. I personally don't find it useful and it takes up the space that can be filled with more interesting content. How is that 'shitposting'?

hoffa 9y ago
It's a refreshingly clean, tiny library without dependencies that can do some cool stuff. Let people like things. Stop shitposting.
- glouwbug 9y ago
  Thankyou for the kind words.

nl 9y ago

It's not shitposting. One of the core requirements of modern deep neural networks is performance. The high accuracy you get from very fast training over large amounts of data is the only reason to look at neural networks over very fast, very accurate systems like XGBoost. If something doesn't deliver that, then it's worth pointing out that it is inadequate for anything but toy tasks.

foldr 9y ago
It's not really worth pointing this out when the thing in question is a 200 line C library. People won't be expecting it to save the world and/or butter their toast.
- kuroguro 9y ago
  +1 also these tiny libraries are great for learning the basics. All of the code has actual meaning behind it and it's super easy to get it up and running.
  - p1esk 9y ago
    No. You definitely don't want to look at C code when you want to learn NN basics.

sctb 9y ago

Please make your point without gratuitous inflammation like “shitposting”. Its effect on the threads should be apparent, and we're trying for better here.