3 ms·
No it isn't different, you failed Bayesian. Evidence is not causality, it can flow backwards in time. For instance, a mammography doesn't give you cancer. But
by loup-vaillant 9y ago
No it isn't different, you failed Bayesian. Evidence is not causality, it can flow backwards in time.
For instance, a mammography doesn't give you cancer. But it can detect one, and thus give you evidence that you had cancer in the first place.